Anneszoo, who at the time was an inventory liquidator who promoted her own Ebay business on Pink Truth with Tracy’s blessing and endorsement, was blatantly soliciting here at PT on that thread for someone to place a qualifying order with a MLM to buy the promotional item for her (a qualifying order is one that triggers a consultant to regain or retain “active” status.)
Again: Please keep in mind that she did not just ask for a single item to be ordered for her. She was asking that a consultant place a qualifying order to be able to purchase a promotional item. MLMs run these promotions all the time to get their consultants to re-up en mass. Pink Truth is not all about helping MLMs retain their consultants.
I was the Maven who stepped in to gently remind that this type of solicitation is not appropriate on these boards, and counter to PT’s mission. Anneszoo was unnecessarily rude to me, and then Tracy clarified. The whole situation has nothing to do with whether Personal Use consultants are welcome on PT, which indeed they are, and I reiterated that fact on the thread. But somehow that became the lightening rod issue. I find it interesting that a few people have kept stirring the pot to such a boiling point, first on that day to make it so the thread had to be reinstated 8 hours after it was deleted by Anneszoo herself, and now bringing it up months later to attack both new members and the Pink Truth community guidelines. How RIDICULOUS!!! That thread is here: http://www.pinktruth.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=65&topic=3033.0
The fact that Shay says she also welcomes PU consultants on her board (sorry, I have not had a chance to check out your site yet, Shay) and also offers education on how to get out of MLM and start their own non-MLM businesses, now that is not much different from what PT is doing, no? I am sure if the linked site turns out to be not what is represented here, then the link will be deleted.
Shay, I am sorry these folks are grinding their axes on your thread.
I am not “griding my axe” on her thread. I’m just politely discussing and I told her that I didn’t want my questioning to feel like an “investigation.”
The problem I had with Shay’s site, albeit she has wonderful intentions, is the one line: “1. Women who work from home (either with a direct-selling company or your own business you have started from scratch). ”
How many times do I have to state this? I was questioning how this site should be a bit of a concern for PT since PT is very much against promotion of DS companies and the like. If Shay was trying to get women out of an MLM, she wouldn’t have had that line up there. Shay has created a site to help women WITH their businesses–DS or personally owned. PT has policy against that, and you said it PUR, and I Quote:
Again: Please keep in mind that she did not just ask for a single item to be ordered for her. She was asking that a consultant place a qualifying order to be able to purchase a promotional item. MLMs run these promotions all the time to get their consultants to re-up en mass. Pink Truth is not all about helping MLMs retain their consultants.
Although you were directing that towards the incident, Shay’s site seems to be HELPING women WITH their businesses, whether be it MLM or not.
By merely asking for someone’s opinion is also a sly way of having people look at the site and possibly join it if they are in MLM and would like to stay. This is AGAINST what PT is about.
And by the way, PUR, where does one DELETE threads?
I find it interesting that a few people have kept stirring the pot to such a boiling point, first on that day to make it so the thread had to be reinstated 8 hours after it was deleted by Anneszoo herself, and now bringing it up months later to attack both new members and the Pink Truth community guidelines.
I have yet to see something like that. Because after about 5-10 minutes, your post is permanently on the forum. |
why? not said
Yeah apple berry for standing your ground! I can’t believe this thread is still up. It’s clear that it’s really not going anywhere but downhill…
Strawberry Shortcake said
I still want to know what credentials Shay has to advise people about businesses, getting them $, and whatever else she said she did. Just seems a bit fishy overall to me.
Duh said
OK, so Shay is saying that she posted a link to her site which deals with home based businesses including DS on a website dealing with a DS company, and she had no idea that people may go over there and join her site? I’m sorry? Is she planning to turn away someone because they found her site through PT? How altruistic of her!
Tracy just posted something about leaving the Pink Truth link on blogs dealing with MLM’s to get more traffic over there. Does she think she invented that particular marketing ploy?
Dizzy from the Dastardly ways of Tracy said
Ok the fucktards missed the WHOLE POINT of Appleberry’s question.
How is it ok for one person to promote their site, while it’s not appropriate for another? That’s it folks, plain and simple. Double standard.
Geez, do you have to spell it out for these idiots?
HOOKERS!
mrsmetaphor said
But Tracy will not link to any other AntiMK or Anti MLM sites…hm?
High Hopes has left the Building said
Reality is a matter of perception to each of us. Tracy’s reality, my reality , your’s, they are all different. But WAY TO GO APPLE!!!! There is no capability of debate or agree to disagree there. It is only see it my way.
Painting Pink Pjs said
Go Apple go go go go go go go go go……………….
NowIGetIt said
Tracy chimes in – oh sorry I didn’t get your permission.
TRACY
PINK TRUTH
Trade Count: (0)
THE QUEEN
Karma: 277
[applaud] [boo]
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
The PINK TRUTH will set you free.
Re: Can you take a look at my new website?
« Reply #55 on: Today at 07:46 AM » Quote
——————————————————————————–
apple berry – I understand what you’re doing here, and I’m sure others do as well. Let’s correct a few of your incorrect statements:
1. No one was banned or had privileges removed for “disagreeing”. Action was taken against members who engaged in egregious behavior that had nothing to do with differences of opinion or disagreements. Please quit promoting lies regarding this.
2. You are incorrect about the rule not existing at the time of the first post that has been brought up in this thread.
3. The prior post was restored only after the usual suspects were spreading untrue gossip about what was said on the thread. It was restored and it remains posted today because of the continued untrue gossip about it. I wanted members to see for themselves exactly what happened.
4. You are incorrect that the prior thread and this current thread relate to the same rule or issue. They do not, in my opinion.
5. The fact that someone was allowed to promote their business on PT doesn’t give them free reign to do whatever they want, whenever they want.
6. This thread is staying up because I don’t believe it was a violation of the rules and I don’t believe there was any ulterior motive beyond wanting feedback on how the site looked.
NowIGetIt said
Appleberry smacks back.
apple berry
Trade Count: (6)
Countess
Karma: 137
[applaud] [boo]
Online
Posts: 881
Re: Can you take a look at my new website?
« Reply #56 on: Today at 08:10 AM » Quote
——————————————————————————–
ok, in the interest of replying in a cohesive way, bear with the divisions in the text…
apple berry – I understand what you’re doing here, and I’m sure others do as well.
Do you? I figure if that were true I wouldn’t have had to ask for clarification.
Let’s correct a few of your incorrect statements:
1. No one was banned or had privileges removed for “disagreeing”. Action was taken against members who engaged in egregious behavior that had nothing to do with differences of opinion or disagreements. Please quit promoting lies regarding this.
That is the side of the story that is here, and the rest are no longer able to defend themselves. Yes, it is true in some cases, and I believe not true in other cases. I am not promoting lies, I am promoting another side to the same story. I am sorry if that is considered a lie.
2. You are incorrect about the rule not existing at the time of the first post that has been brought up in this thread.
That may be, and I don’t have the ability to see what was posted for rules at the time of the post. It is possible that my memory is off. Perhaps I missed it because you had promoted using her previously. I know I have found her extremely helpful, and only a stand-up woman whose feathers get ruffled only occasionally.
3. The prior post was restored only after the usual suspects were spreading untrue gossip about what was said on the thread. It was restored and it remains posted today because of the continued untrue gossip about it. I wanted members to see for themselves exactly what happened.
Then why removed Anne’s apology and her comment that she would take the thread down to avoid more dissention? I remember reading that shortly before it was taken down. Of course, my memory again maybe wrong.
4. You are incorrect that the prior thread and this current thread relate to the same rule or issue. They do not, in my opinion.
I didn’t say they related to the same rule. I said they were threads on the same cloth. That cloth being that I see this one as a violation of rules, and it appears that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander.
5. The fact that someone was allowed to promote their business on PT doesn’t give them free reign to do whatever they want, whenever they want.
Fair enough, although I wonder how they know what the line is.
6. This thread is staying up because I don’t believe it was a violation of the rules and I don’t believe there was any ulterior motive beyond wanting feedback on how the site looked.
Ok, so it stays, again, that is your call alone, and so does the other one. Then I guess people can come to both threads, review both, and have the ability, as an adult, to judge for themselves if there seems to be a double standard with relation to the application of rules. At this point I am not sure I could have asked for more. Your response, and for others to have the ability to read both with a critical eye, and judge for themselves
I am not sorry for asking the questions.
Dizzy from the Dastardly ways of Tracy said
Tick Tock Tick Tock Appleberry will be booted any time now. Way to go Apple for standing up to the Queen Bitch. Don’t worry, you won’t miss it when you’re booted.
HOOKERS!
PC said
Tracy you are a fool. You say that certain people were banned because :
“No one was banned or had privileges removed for “disagreeing”. Action was taken against members who engaged in egregious behavior that had nothing to do with differences of opinion or disagreements”
This is complete and utter CRAP. Obviously you don’t have the BALLS TO SAY WHAT THEIR CRIMES WERE. Why don’t you just come right out and say it? “So-and-so was banned because she started questioning some of my behavior”??
And this shit: “egregious behavior” – what exactly is so eggious that you get kicked off a site like PT, hmmm?
Could it be that they visited a blog you don’t approve of? That in doing so, they DISOBEYED your orders?
Really tracy, please shut up. I don’t think I can stand to hear anymore of your stupid grade-school baby whining crying blubbering backstabbing bullying nasty bullshit.
GET. A. LIFE.
PC said
that should be “egregious” LOL
I’m SO SICK of this shit out of Tracy. She really must have no clue how freaking STUPID she looks.
mrsmetaphor said
Appleberry won’t get booted. See, I don’t think people are getting banned anymore unless they “ask” to be banned or post a link to duh or ptlies or some such thing.
I’m serious, I think that maybe Tracy realizes that if she had not been so quick on the trigger finger with the bannings she wouldn’t have a website called BANNED FROM THE BITCHFEST…duh…and I mean that.
So, I think she’ll stop banning and just keep hoping that people who ask questions and disagree will just leave. And they will. And the next shift of people will come in and with them a few question askers…and they’ll get slapped down and they’ll leave…blah blah blah.
I’d be suprised if Apple gets booted. She’d be a complete idiot to start the banning stuff again. I just don’t know what she’ll do instead to exert her “power.” Hopefully she’s working on figuring out what the voice of the servant is in this…her responses don’t reflect that voice right now.
mrsmetaphor said
Let’s do a quick run down…PC you were banned because Tracy was paranoid that you were selling information to the enemy, Pinklighthouse, right? Your outlandish behavior was calling her on her paranoia and telling her BY PM, BY EMAIL, ON THE PRIVATE BOARD….NOT on the main site..that she was wrong to do the things she was doing.
LISTEN…you lurking PTers…people here who were banned were banned because Tracy is paranoid…NO OTHER REASON.
Those of you who were banned…list here your egregious offense please….
Strawberry Shortcake said
Mrs, I thought you had trouble logging in earlier today? I guess Tracy has been reading and fixed the trouble?
I don’t think I’ve been banned. Let me check….. No, still works.
mrsmetaphor said
I had trouble earlier but I got in again. Yeah, maybe she fixed it for me. I had tried to follow a link that PUR had in her post to the annezoo thread. I can never find things on the board…but that took me outta the back door and in through the front. I got the error message about me being “blocked” and to contact the admin.
So I closed my browser and went back in and that took me back to the boards. I was able to log in. Yeah, the back door is still open.
I don’t actually care if I get banned.
FreeFromPT (sickie/happ2beme) said
I NEVER posted anything about Tracy on the main site. I told her my thoughts about her actions ON THE PHONE, in e-mails and on a very private board (NOT the maven board or in the news or myspace).
Holla CDSS! said
AppleBerry:
Come to the darkside. We have cookies.
(and He-man fur panties, PC says so)
Strawberry Shortcake said
So PT has more than the “secret” maven and news boards?
FreeFromPT (sickie/happ2beme) said
Yes.
PC said
Of course she does!! She always has to have a super-secret board where she can brag on herself and trash everyone else! LOL Although who besides PUR can she trust at this point?
MM – did Tracy think I was “spying” on PT for Pinklighthouse? Seriously? I didn’t think that was why I was banned. She just didn’t like me because I didn’t back her when she said it was “every woman for herself” and started ripping off PinkLighthouse. I dared to ask her to please not be such a huge bitch, and not make this into a competition – THAT’S why I was banned. Oh – and she thought i was a backstabber. LOL
mrsmetaphor said
Didn’t she ban all the brainstormers from PL after that? That’s what leads me to say it was because you would be a spy.
ScrewU said
PC
In Tracy’s defense, when you asked her not to be such a huge bitch, maybe she thought you were asking her not to be such a fat ass. Maybe?
PC said
yeah she banned all of us after that – but I don’t think it was because of spying – it was just spite. Like “if you think I’m a meanie, then you don’t get to be on my board”.
LOL
PC said
ScrewU – I can’t say. bahahahaa
and one more thought: all of Tracy’s paranoia and suspicions are coming true, aren’t they?
MM – what’s that verse that talks about “your fears will fall upon you”? I gotta go look that up again.
mrsmetaphor said
Oh, well that is such a better reason….lol….
throwinguppink said
What a fucking liar!!!
Tracy, please do tell EVERYONE what I did to get banned!!
Nothing. Nothing at all…
Oh, wait… I was at Pinklighthouse (the real forum for help with scary kay) so that is why I was banned. Hmmmm… Doesn’t really add up with what Tracy says, huh?
Fucking bitch.
Duh said
I was banned because I had the gall to post on my My Space blog that outing people and having blog wars about Mary Kay was childish and idiotic. Sickie went and told on me, and Tracy said, “Hey all… I have no patience these days for the silliness of people like QJ and now Erin. If they don’t want to play nicely (and give just a shred of respect to yours truly) then they don’t need to have the privilege of being a part of this site.”
Then I became aware of the fact that Tracy and others were implying that I was banned because I hate retarded people. They got that from the fact that I called someone a retard and said that another person, “rides the short bus”.
Egregious, yes, and Beavis likes it too.
Dana said
What did I do to be banned? Certainly nothing on the board since I had never posted!
Has Appleberry received a notification that her password has been changed yet?
Fox Spirit said
Does anyone know WHY TC is paranoid? I mean is there a *reason*?? I mean obviously she has a right to think everyone is watching her every step and misstep, since that is at least true. However, does anyone know why it started? Or where?
Mrs M, I think you are right, it doesn’t look like apple berry is going to get banned b/c I think that will lend even more credence to the idea that she is paranoid and banning people unnecessarily. It does sound like the clock should be ticking on the welcome mat though
Mercedes said
you go apple berry! I lurves you! I talk just a little bit like that on PT and I question some actions, behaviors, and doings just a little bit and WHAAAM! My privileges were taken away and then I was FALSELY accused of breaking the rules (that had been changed after the fact). Then I tried to tell everyone goodbye in a post (everyone else that left when I did got to tell PT goodbye) and my thread got pulled and I was banned-I asked for my banning process to be completed. Anywho-Go apple berry!!! Karma to you girl!!! Wish I weren’t so busy right now with my job, family and health issues…so I could keep up with EVERYTHING…
Who let the dogs out? WOOF! WOOF! WOOF-WOOF-WOOF!
Who let the dogs out? WOOF! WOOF! WOOF-WOOF-WOOF!
p.s.-Tracy said “if they don’t want to play nicely and give a shed of respect to her?”
Whatever!!! She doesn’t even have a clue what the word R-E-S-P-E-C-T means.
BITCHES and HOS!
Mercedes said
BTW-PC-You go! You said it-you took the words right out of my mouth!
TRACY…WHAT SHE SAID! NOW! DO IT!
Chicken-bawwwwwk! bawk-bawk-bawk-bawk-bawk-bawk-bawwwwwwk!
WOOOOOF!
eyesicle said
I find it interesting that a few people have kept stirring the pot to such a boiling point, first on that day to make it so the thread had to be reinstated 8 hours after it was deleted by Anneszoo herself, and now bringing it up months later to attack both new members and the Pink Truth community guidelines.
Stirring the pot is refuting BULLSHIT arguments and calling someone on their HYPOCRISY?????????
AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!
eyesicle said
PS: Erin, are you serious? You called someone a retard and said something about the short bus? Ummmmmm…sorry about the smite. I was stupid and didn’t know the whole story.
BUT….your mullet thread kicked ASS!
PC said
Fox Spirit:
Tracy has been acting this way online as far back as 2004, that people are aware of around here.
We don’t know why she’s so paranoid, but she walks around EXPECTING everyone to “stab her in the back”, and she seems to collect backstabbers like my grandma collects used tissues up her sleeve. I think it has something to do with her ego: she thinks she’s uber-important and a big private investigator – so naturally she thinks that everyone is either jealous of her, or afraid of her.
Dana said
Okay, so appleberry left shay karma this afternoon, pretty much apologizing for what she said in her thread.
freefrompt said
Duh, you would not have all this fame today if it weren’t for me. 😉
I didn’t tell on you, YOU told on you. LOL You put it out in the open on your myspace blog for everyone to read, ya dork. — Never mind, that would mean I couldn’t take full credit. Scratch that. It’s all MEEEEEEEEEE. *evil cackle*
Dana said
But Mrs, what is up with you leaving PUR karma both of the last two days? I’m so disappointed…….. I thought we were shunning her like junior high girls would. 🙂
freefrompt said
Well, as mrs RUDELY (ROFL) pointed out Shay was caught in the cross fire of this mess. Tracy is the one who can’t keep her eye on the ball.
Tracy: are you PRO or ANTI MLM? Not a hard question, but it REQUIRES follow through.
Duh said
That’s OK Eyesicle. At least you were thinking of me. Next time, don’t be such a retard, k?
prdiva4 said
UGH!
Tracy is so stupid. You know I believed her lies like an idiot. Before she banned PC she was trying to fill my head with lies about PC and how she was the reason LJ didn;t wanted her there and I believed her. Then, she made the whole situation looked like PC was trying to accuse me of a spy and she how PC wanted to get me against LJ. That’s when PC and I had the breakdown on PT “private” board, I think Mrs M was a witness, she was actually trying to get PC and I to make peace.
She keeps doing the same thing over and over and is annoying. I know people will keep realizing sooner or later.
prdiva4 said
I meant to say how PC wanted LJ against me ….:P
maggie said
I still have not received a response from her to my open letter on why I was banned. (I don’t really expect one).